A service evaluation of measuring fluid responsiveness in acutely unwell hypotensive patients outside of critical care.

INTRODUCTION: Early recognition and prompt, appropriate management may reduce mortality in patients with sepsis. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign's guidelines suggest the use of dynamic measurements to guide fluid resuscitation in sepsis; although these methods are rarely employed to monitor cardiac output in response to fluid administration outside intensive care units. This service evaluation investigated the introduction of a nurse led protocolised goal-directed fluid management using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor to the standard assessment of hypotensive ward patients. METHODS: We introduced the use of a goal-directed fluid management protocol into our critical care outreach teams' standard clinical assessment. Forty-nine sequential patients before and thirty-nine after its introduction were included in the assessment. RESULTS: Patients in the post-intervention cohort received less fluid in the 6 h following outreach assessment (750mls vs 1200mls). There were no differences in clinical background or rates of renal replacement therapy, but rates of invasive and non-invasive ventilation were reduced (0% vs 31%). Although the groups were similar, the post-intervention patients had lower recorded blood pressures. CONCLUSION: IV fluid therapy in the patient with hypotension complicating sepsis can be challenging. Excessive IV fluid administration is commonplace and associated with harm, and the use of advanced non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring by trained nurses can provide objective evaluation of individualised response to treatment. Avoiding excessive IV fluid and earlier institution of appropriate vasopressor therapy may improve patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Adoption of dynamic measures of cardiac output outside of critical care by trained critical care nurses is feasible and may translate into improved patient outcomes. In hospitals with a nurse-led critical care outreach service, consideration should be given to such an approach.

New biomarkers in acute kidney injury.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a commonly encountered clinical syndrome. Although it often complicates community acquired illness, it is more common in hospitalized patients, particularly those who are critically ill or who have undergone major surgery. Approximately 20% of hospitalized adult patients develop an AKI during their hospital care, and this rises to nearly 60% in the critically ill, depending on the population being considered. In general, AKI is more common in older adults, in those with preexisting chronic kidney disease and in those with known risk factors for AKI (including diabetes and hypertension). The development of AKI is associated with an increase in both mortality and morbidity, including the development of post-AKI chronic kidney disease. Currently, AKI is defined by a rise in serum creatinine from either a known or derived baseline value and/or oliguria or anuria. However, clinicians may fail to recognize the initial development of AKI because of a delay in the rise of serum creatinine or because of inaccurate urine output monitoring. This, in turn, delays any putative measures to treat AKI or to limit its degree. Consequently, efforts have focused on new biomarkers associated with AKI that may allow early recognition of this syndrome with the intent that this will translate into improved patient outcomes. Here we outline current biomarkers associated with AKI and explore their potential in aiding diagnosis, understanding the pathophysiology and directing therapy.

Development of a web-based tool for undergraduate engagement in medical research; the ProjectPal experience.

BACKGROUND: We report the development and evaluation of a web-based tool designed to facilitate student extra-curricular engagement in medical research through project matching students with academic supervisors. UK based university students were surveyed to explore their perceptions of undergraduate research, barriers and facilitators to current engagement. Following this, an online web-based intervention ( www.ProjectPal.org ) was developed to support access of students to research projects and supervisors. A pilot intervention was undertaken across a London-based university in January 2013 to February 2016. In March 2016, anonymised data were extracted from the prospective data log for analysis of website engagement and usage. Supervisors were surveyed to evaluate the website and student outputs. RESULTS: Fifty-one students responded to the electronic survey. Twenty-four (47%) reported frustration at a perceived lack of opportunities to carry out extra-curricular academic projects. Major barriers to engaging in undergraduate research reported were difficulties in identifying suitable supervisors (33/51; 65%) and time pressures (36/51; 71%) associated with this. Students reported being opportunistic in their engagement with undergraduate research. Following implementation of the website, 438 students signed up to ProjectPal and the website was accessed 1357 times. Access increased on a yearly basis. Overall, 70 projects were advertised by 35 supervisors. There were 86 applications made by students for these projects. By February 2016, the 70 projects had generated 5 peer-review publications with a further 7 manuscripts under peer-review, 14 national presentations, and 1 national prize. CONCLUSION: The use of an online platform to promote undergraduate engagement with extra-curricular research appears to facilitate extra-curricular engagement with research. Further work to understand the impact compared to normal opportunistic practices in enhancing student engagement is now underway.